R v Gilfoyle
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2001 |
| Date | 2001 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Kennedy v Cordia (Services) LLP
...academic research and a methodology which was not yet sufficiently developed that it could be treated as reliable. See also, for example, R v Gilfoyle [2001] 2 Cr App R 5, in which the English Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) refused to admit expert evidence on "psychological autopsy" f......
-
R v Reed; R v Garmson
...what was believed to be the test in the United States in Frye v US 293 F 1013 (1923) and the consideration of it by this Court in R v Gilfoyle (no2) [2001] 2 Cr App R 57, referred to at paragraph 29 with approval to a passage set out in Cross and Tapper: The Law of Evidence now to be found ......
-
John Oliver Dyrud v Palmavon Jasamin Webster
...LLP [2016] 1 WLR 597 applied; Pora v The Queen [2015] UKPC 9 at 24 considered; Young v her Majesty's Advocate 2014 SLT 21 considered; R v Gilfoyle [2001] 2 Cr App R 5 considered; Davie v Magistrates of Edinburgh (1953) SC 34 considered. 8. The Webster Application sought to appoint Mr. Ho......
-
John Oliver Dyrud v Palmavon Jasamin Webster
...LLP [2016] 1 WLR 597 applied; Pora v The Queen [2015] UKPC 9 at 24 considered; Young v her Majesty's Advocate 2014 SLT 21 considered; R v Gilfoyle [2001] 2 Cr App R 5 considered; Davie v Magistrates of Edinburgh (1953) SC 34 considered. 8. The Webster Application sought to appoint Mr. Ho......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
-
‘A new and more rigorous approach’ to expert evidence in England and Wales?
...EWCA Crim 589 at [14].17. [2012] 54 EHRR 23.18. Riat, above n. 16 at [33].19. RvRobb (1991) 93 Cr App R 161 at 166–7; RvGilfoyle [2001] 2 Cr App R 5 at [24]; Luttrell, above n. 15 at 36.20. Above, n. 8 at 40.232 The International Journal of Evidence & Proof evidence can be considered ‘relia......
-
The Reliability of Expert Evidence: Reflections on the Law Commission's Proposals for Reform
...a residual discretion to refuse to admit evidence which appears so unreliableas to imperil the accused’s right to a fair trial.18 [2001] 2 Cr App R 5 (p. 57). The court engaged in an enhanced test to determinethe reliability of the profiling evidence of a forensic psychologist. The appella......
-
Expert Opinion Evidence: The Middle Way
...the elevation of a witness to anexpert. In Dallagher, a police officer testified for the prosecution.38 More31 Above n. 29 at 239.32 [2001] 2 Cr App R 5 at [18].33 Ibid. at [28].34 J. Vasagar and R. Allison, ‘How cot deaths shattered mother’s dreams’, Guardian,12 June 2003, available at h......
-
Proposals for Reforming the Law of Self-Defence
...in HMAdvocate v Grimmond (David) 2002 SLT 508.67 Folkes v Chadd (1782) 3 Doug KB 157.68 Rv Turner [1975] QB 834 at 841.69 Rv Gilfoyle [2001] 2 Cr App R 5 at H10.70 T. Hobbs, ‘Parental Alienation Syndrome and UK Family Courts, Part 1’ [2002] 32Family Law 182–9.71 A. Gold, Expert Evidence in ......
Request a trial to view additional results