R v Gill

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1963
Year1963
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Public Prosecutor v Mohd Aszzid Abdullah
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 2008
  • SL (A Juvenile) v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 8 Noviembre 2001
  • DPP for Northern Ireland v Lynch
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 12 Marzo 1975
    ...there were reasonable opportunity for the will to reassert itself, no justification can be found in antecedent threats." 33In the case of R. v. Gill [1963] 1 W.L.R. 841, it was recognised in the Court of Criminal Appeal that duress could be a defence where there were charges of conspiracy ......
  • Zenaida Go v The Queen [NTR]
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 26 Noviembre 1990
    ...v Australian Public Service Assocation (1982) 66 FLR 90 Martin (1961) 45 CAR 199 Oliver (1944) 1 KB 67 R v Barraclough (1906) 1 KB 201 R v Cox (1923) NZLR 596 R v Garner (1964) NSWR 1131 R v Gash (1881) 1 QLJ 54 R v Gill (1963) 2 All ER 688 R v Hally (1962) Qd R 214 R v Hare (1910) 29 NZL......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Four Threats to the Presumption of Innocence
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 10-4, July 2006
    • 1 Julio 2006
    ...Above n. 12.76 See decisions such as RvMancini [1942] AC 1 (provocation), RvLobell [1957] 1 QB 547 (self-defence),and RvGill [1963] 1 WLR 841 (duress).77 See T. H. Jones, ‘Insanity, Automatism, and the Burden of Proof on the Accused’ (1995) 111 LQR 475.Jones notes, inter alia, that the Euro......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT