R v Goddard
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1990 |
| Year | 1990 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
R (1) QSA v (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department
...in a public place for immoral purposes.” The object of the solicitation under this provision could be a man or a woman: R v Goddard (1990) 92 Cr.App.R 185, although most of those prosecuted under s 32 of the 1956 Act were gay men. The offence remained in force until repealed by the Sexual O......
-
Legister (Anthony) and Lincoln Fray v R
...a simple straightforward statement to that effect is all that is required. This does not seem to be an onerous imposition. In R. v Goddard and Others [1962] 3 All E.R. 582, Lord Parker C. J. in delivering the judgment of the court at p. 586 said: "Quite clearly, it is idle to give that dir......
-
R v Kirkup
...gave no definition of immoral purposes. The court, having referred to Crook v EdmondsonELR ((1966) 2 QB 81); R v GoddardUNK ((1990) 92 Cr App R 185); R v Ford (Graham)WLR ([1977] 1 WLR 1083) andR v GrayUNK ((1981) 74 Cr App R 324), stated that the law was that an immoral purpose in section ......
1 books & journal articles
-
Prostitutes and Persons
...‘It is an offence for a man persistently to solicit or importune in a public placefor immoral purposes’.40 Although R. v. Goddard (1990) 92 Cr. App. R. 185 (CA) indicates that some circumstancesor the nature of some overtures might cast light on whether they were for an immoralpurpose. 41 (......