R v Grays Justices, ex parte Graham

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1982
Date1982
CourtDivisional Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • R v Chief Constable of the Merseyside Police, ex parte Calveley
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 November 1985
    ...to the applicant." 49The Oxford Justices' case was not drawn to the attention of the Divisional Court later the same year in Reg. v. Gray's J.J., ex parte Graham [1982] Q.B. 1239. That was one in which the justices proposed to commit for trial on indictment and the applicant had been questi......
  • R v Horseferry Road Magistrates Court ex parte Bennett (A.P.)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 24 June 1993
    ...73 Cr.App.R. 67; [1981] Q.B. 445; Watford Justices, Ex parte Outrim (1982) [1983] R.T.R. 26; Grays Justices, Ex parte Graham (1982) 75 Cr.App.R. 229; [1982] 3 All E.R. 653. The power has, however, been described by the Lord Chief Justice as being 'very strictly confined': see Oxford Cit......
  • State (O'Connell) v Fawsitt
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 30 July 1986
    ...I.L.R.M. 40. The State (Cuddy) v. Mangan (Unreported, High Court, D'Arcy J., 1st July, 1985). Reg. v. Grays Justices, Ex parte Graham [1982] Q.B. 1239; [1982] 3 W.L.R. 596; [1982] 3 All E.R. 653; (1982) 75 Cr. App. R. 229. The State (Abenglen Properties) v. Corporation of Dublin [1984] I.R.......
  • Jago v District Court (Nsw)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Agreement for Costs on a Contingency Basis
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 63-5, October 1999
    • 1 October 1999
    ...review ofthe decisions to proceed in this way.The decisions in R vManchesterSM,expSnelson[1977] 1 WLR911andinRvGraysJJ,exp Graham[1982] 3 All ER 653 establishtherulethatthedischarge of a defendant in committal proceedings doesnotoperate as abar to a subsequent prosecution forthesame offence......
  • When to Query Summons as Vexatious
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 63-5, October 1999
    • 1 October 1999
    ...review ofthe decisions to proceed in this way.The decisions in R vManchesterSM,expSnelson[1977] 1 WLR911andinRvGraysJJ,exp Graham[1982] 3 All ER 653 establishtherulethatthedischarge of a defendant in committal proceedings doesnotoperate as abar to a subsequent prosecution forthesame offence......