R v Halliday
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1917 |
| Date | 1917 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
82 cases
- Johnson Tan Han Seng v PP and Soon Seng Sia Heng v PP and PP v Chea Soon Hoong and Teh Cheng Poh v PP
- Minister for Home Affairs and Others; Teo Soh Lung
-
Teo Soh Lung v Minister for Home Affairs and Others
...PradeshAIR 1987 SC 663 (distd) PP v Khong Teng Khen [1976] 2 MLJ 166 (refd) Phang Chin Hock v PP [1980] 1 MLJ 70 (refd) R v Halliday [1917] AC 260 (folld) Yeap Hock Seng v Minister for Home Affairs, Malaysia [1975] 2 MLJ 279 (refd) Zamora, The [1916] 2 AC 77 (folld) Constitution of the Repu......
- Karam Singh v Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negeri (Minister of Home Affairs), Malaysia
Request a trial to view additional results
12 books & journal articles
-
Comparative Perspectives on the Detention of Terrorist Suspects
...Realm (Consolidation) Act, 1914, 5 Geo. 5, c. 8 (Eng.). [541] SIMPSON, supra note 538, at 15-17. [542] R v. Holliday, ex parte Zadig, [1917] A.C. 260 (U.K.); see also David Foxton, R. v. Halliday ex parte Zadig in Retrospect, 119 L.Q.R. 455 (2003). [543] Defence of the Realm (Consolidation)......
-
Courts 2
...was under a duty to make the communication. See Stuard v. Bell (1891) 2 Q.B.350: Minter v. Priest (1930) A.C. 558 and Adam v. Ward (1917) A.C.307.” - Per Oguntade, J.C.A. in Emeagwara v. Guardian Newspaper Ltd. Suit No. CA/J/135/93; (1998) 1 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 535) 610 at 627. 1565. Relevant que......
-
The Great Depression, this Depression, and Administrative Law
...statutory instrument bore a heavy onus, and (at 648) that he had been unable to find any precedent of such a challenge since R v Halliday [1917] AC 260. 19 Wade and Forsyth, above n 10,14. 20 Lord G Hewart, The New Despotism (1929). 21 Lord G Hewart Not Without Prejudice (1937) 96. He was u......
-
THE CASE FOR A CANADIAN NONDELEGATION DOCTRINE.
...note 169 at para 54. (208) Gray, supra note 9 at 156-57 [emphasis added, citations omitted]. (209) Ibid at 160. (210) Ibid at 157. (211) [1917] AC 260, UKHL 1 (212) Bora Laskin, "Case and Comment" (1943) 21:2 Can Bar Rev 141 at 144, 148. (213) Ontario School Boards, supra note 24 at 362-65.......
Request a trial to view additional results