R v Hancox
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1913 |
Year | 1913 |
Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Douglas (Eaton) v R
...will set aside a verdict on this ground on a question of fact alone only where the verdict was obviously and palpably wrong - see R v Hancox 8 Cr App. R 193, R v Joseph Lao 12 JLR 1238 and R v Pickersgill (unreported) RMCA 28/2000 delivered 7th June 2001. This ground must fail. 43 Ground 2 ......
-
R v Bernard
...1. This court is at liberty to set aside a verdict on a question of fact alone only where the verdict vas obviously or palpably wrong. R. v. Hancox, 8 Cr. App. R. 193. This means that upon an objective assessment by this court, the evidence must be judged to be of such a quality as to be i......
-
Yusuke (david) Sena v New Zealand Police
...have been satisfied of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 R v Hand CA200/98, 28 October 1998 at 11. R v Hancox (1913) 8 Cr App R 193 (Crim App) at R v Ramage [1985] 1 NZLR 392 (CA) at 393. See, for instance, R v Lui [1989] 1 NZLR 496 (CA) at 501; and Herewini, above n 15, a......
-
Phillip and Lutchman v R
...12 Cr. App. R. 273: The court will set aside a verdict on a question of fact alone only where the verdict was obviously and palpably wrong. R v Hancox, 8 Cr. App. R 193.” While that statement is no longer applicable to appeals in England it continues to be applicable to appeals to this cou......
Request a trial to view additional results