R v Hendon Justices, ex parte DPP

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Date1993
Year1993

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • DPP v Tonie Jarman
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 10 December 2013
    ...that the decision of the lay magistrates was unreasonable and was a nullity. The prosecution referred to R v Hendon Justices (ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions) [1993] 96 Cr App R 227, in which, on the particular facts of that case, this court found that the magistrates had acted out......
  • DPP v Stafford Magistrates' Court Dennis Weston (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 7 February 2013
    ...its power to dismiss the allegation." 12 An issue not dissimilar to the present was considered by this court in Hendon Justices, ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions [1994] QB 167. That case followed shortly after a previous, again not dissimilar case, namely Sutton Justices, ex parte D......
  • DPP v Gowing
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 11 December 2013
    ... ... current edition of Archbold at chapter 4.76 is instructive: "The power of justices to stay criminal proceedings for abuse of process is to be most sparingly exercised and should be ... most exceptional cases to, in effect, punish the prosecution for its inefficiency; See R (Hendon Justices) ex p. the Director of Public Prosecutions [1993] 96 Cr.App.R 227; the Director of Public ... ...
  • R (Wirral Health Authority and Another) v Mental Health Review Tribunal and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 November 2001
    ...of natural justice. 13A number of cases in which this principle has been applied were considered by the Divisional Court in R v Hendon Justices ex parte DPP [1994] QB 167, 175 and following. Scott Baker J considered this decision at paragraphs 59 to 63 of his judgment in the present case a......
  • Get Started for Free