R v Highbury Magistrates' Court, ex parte Boyce
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1984 |
| Year | 1984 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
R v Conway (John)
...reject it: R v Horsham Justices, Ex parte BukhariUNK ((1982) 74 Cr App R 291) and R v Highbury Magistrates' Court, Ex parte BoyceUNK ((1984) 79 Cr App R 132). However, the fact that the justices were obliged to permit that admission underlay the importance of complying, where compliance was......
-
Neill v North Antrim Magistrates' Court and Another
...Plainly, this is quite inconsistent with any notion that admissibility is a matter for the trial judge alone. R. v. Highbury Magistrates' Court, Ex parte Boyce (1984) 79 Cr. App. R. 132 and R. v. Oxford City Justices, Ex parte Berry [1988] Q.B. 507 are not authorities to the contrary, since......
-
Musa v Jones (Magistrate)
...Magistrates, Ex parte Adam [1977] 1 W.L.R. 1197; Reg v. Coleshill Justices, Ex parte Davies [1971] 1 W.L.R. 1684; Reg v. Highbury Magistrates' Court, Ex parte Boyce (1984) 79 Cr. App. R 132 … The question is, however, whether the reception of inadmissible evidence will found this remedy. As......
-
The Queen v Benoit
...Coal Board v. Gamble [1959] 1 Q.B. 11; Johnson v. Youden [1950] 1 K.B. 544; Neill v. North Antrim Magistrates' Court ex parte Boyce (1984) 79 Cr App R 132; R v. Ricketts and another– [2011] All E.R. (D) 125 (Apr); R v. Watt (James) & ors [2011] E.W.C.A. Crim. 1325). 1 Ramdhani, J. (AG.) On ......
Request a trial to view additional results