R v Highbury Magistrates' Court, ex parte Boyce
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1984 |
| Year | 1984 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
- R v Conway (John)
-
Neill v North Antrim Magistrates' Court and Another
...Plainly, this is quite inconsistent with any notion that admissibility is a matter for the trial judge alone. R. v. Highbury Magistrates' Court, Ex parte Boyce (1984) 79 Cr. App. R. 132 and R. v. Oxford City Justices, Ex parte Berry [1988] Q.B. 507 are not authorities to the contrary, since......
- R v Oxford City Justices, ex parte Berry
-
Musa v Jones (Magistrate)
...Magistrates, Ex parte Adam [1977] 1 W.L.R. 1197; Reg v. Coleshill Justices, Ex parte Davies [1971] 1 W.L.R. 1684; Reg v. Highbury Magistrates' Court, Ex parte Boyce (1984) 79 Cr. App. R 132 … The question is, however, whether the reception of inadmissible evidence will found this remedy. As......
Get Started for Free