R v Hill
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1992 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
- R v Fernandez
-
Roberts v R
... ... What does appear is the substance ‘cocaine.’ Nor was ‘any salt’ described in the certificate. 19 Reference was made to the cases of R. v. Hunt (4); Hydes v. R. (1); and R. v. Hill (3). In R. v. Hunt it was held that as it was an offence to possess morphine in one form but not an offence to possess it in another form, it was for the prosecution to prove that the morphine in the possession of the appellant had been in the prohibited form, which it had not done. Lord Griffiths ... ...
-
DPP v Finnamore
... ... v Hill - Whether Circuit Judge erred in law in failing to allow plea of autrefois acquis - Whether failure to withdraw s. 15A Misuse of Drugs Act 1977, as amended, charge was error of law Facts: The applicant was found guilty of certain drugs charges on a retrial and was sentenced to eight ... ...
-
R v Gruber (Roland)
...The classic formulation to the jury of the appropriate approach is contained in cases such as R v Harris [1969] 53 Cr App R 376, and R v Hill [1993] 96 Cr App R 456, which is to the effect that the jury should focus on the more serious count, and then consider the alternative only in the ev......
Request a trial to view additional results