R v Howell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1974
Date1974
CourtCrown Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • R v Hoare (Kevin); R v Pierce (Graham)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 2 April 2004
    ...it would still have been reasonable for him to have mentioned such facts at the time, in accordance with the reasoning of this Court in R v. Howell [2003] Crim L R 405 and R v. Knight, The Times, August 20, 2003? Or can they only do so where they are satisfied that he did not, in the light ......
  • Daniel v The State
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 16 March 2007
    ...such as the evidence of his lack of motive. In this regard, the case of Price v. The State (1982) 37 W.I.R. 222. See also the case of R v. Howell [1974] 2 All E.R. 806. is instructive. In this case, the Court of Appeal of Guyana found that although the trial judge should have told the jury ......
  • George v R
    • Antigua and Barbuda
    • Court of Appeal (Antigua and Barbuda)
    • 18 June 1984
    ...does not assist him provided the necessary intent is there. A drunken intent is nevertheless an intent. 10 In addition to the foregoing R v Howell [1974] 2 All E.R. 806 listed among the cases submitted by counsel for the appellant is authority for saying that self induced intoxication resul......
  • Sylvester George Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
    • Antigua and Barbuda
    • Court of Appeal (Antigua and Barbuda)
    • 18 July 1984
    ...him provided the necessary intent is there. A drunken intent is nevertheless an intent. 11 In addition to the foregoingR v Howell [1974] 2 All E.R. 806 listed among the cases submitted by Counsel for the appellant is authority for saying that self induced intoxication resulting from drink o......