R v Hull University Visitor, ex parte Page

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date27 March 1991
CourtHouse of Lords
Date27 March 1991

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
189 cases
  • Syarikat Kenderaan Melayu Kelantan Bhd v Transport Workers Union
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • R v Visitors to the Inns of Court, ex parte Calder and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 January 1993
    ...supervisory jurisdiction of the courts. In R v Lord President of the Privy Council, Ex parte PageTLRWLR (The Times December 15, 1992; [1992] 3 WLR 1112) the House of Lords had held by a majority that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the application for judicial review of the decis......
  • Governor v McLaughlin
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 8 August 2006
    ...[2000] 4 P.L.R. 59; [2001] A.C.D. 23; (2000), 3 L.G.L.R. 18; 82 P. & C.R. 17, followed. (7) R. v. Hull University Visitor, ex p. Page, [1993] A.C. 682; [1993] 1 All E.R. 97; [1993] I.C.R. 114, followed. (8) Ridge v. Baldwin, [1964] A.C. 40; [1963] 2 All E.R. 66, considered. (9) Vine v. Nati......
  • Union of Clerical, Administrative and Supervisory Employees and Others v Industrial Disputes Tribunal & Anpr
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 31 May 2013
    ...or which resulted in the award having been made as it was. See in this regard: R v Lord President of the Privy Council, ex p. Page— [1993] A.C. 682. I am not in agreement with the submission of learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Gifford, that the Tribunal erred in having failed to mak......
  • Get Started for Free
14 books & journal articles