R v Hunt
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1950 |
| Year | 1950 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
R v Preece ; R v Howells
...in Hall's case, we have come to a different conclusion as to the effect of the earlier case law. The point was first considered in R. v. Jones ((1896) 1 Q.B. p.4). The court affirmed the conviction of Jones who was charged upon one count with having committed an act of gross indecency with ......
-
Crampton v R
...charged because the conduct alleged did not include actual participatory conduct (voluntary or involuntary) by the complainant. 59 In R v Jones58 the Bench, without explicit reference, seems to have accepted that the equivalent provision in the United Kingdom required a participatory consen......
-
Jason Jones v The Attorney General and The Equal Opportunity Commission, The Trinidad and Tobago Council of Evangelical Churches, The Sanatan Dharma Maha Sabha of Trinidad and Tobago
...offence of gross indecency. Counsel for the defendant adopted the definition for the crime of gross indecency as outlined in the case of R v. Hunt [1950] 2 All E.R. 291 there being none previously outlined in the Ordinance. That definition provides that: “It is quite clear that physical co......
-
R v Holmes (Peter)
... ... R v Hunt (James) [ 1950 ] 2 All ER 291 , CA, applied. APPEAL against conviction On 30 May 2022 in the Crown Court at Bradford before Judge Nadim and a jury the defendant, Peter Holmes, was convicted of 13 offences of sexual assault contrary to section 15(1) of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 and 16 ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Promotion Exams
...to show that there was any physical contact between themen, provided it can be proved that they were acting in concert:R. v. Hunt [1950] 2 All E.R. 291.There must, of course, be two or more men; one man alonecommitting an indecent act does not contravene this section. Thisdoes not mean, how......