R v Hussain (Akhtar); R v Bhatti (Nazir); R v Bhatti (Shahid)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2002] EWCA Crim 6
Date2002
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • R v Ali (Liaquat)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 9 July 2008
    ...but see paragraph 39 of Montila. We also note that this court said in paragraph 33 of its judgment in R v Hussain [2002] EWCA Crim 06 [2002] 2 Cr App R 26 page 363 at 375 of equivalent conspiracy charges: '… as we have already said, the Crown have to establish the Conspiracy Offence compris......
  • R v Harmer (Roy Peter)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 21 January 2005
    ...see paragraph 39 of Montila. We also note that this court said in paragraph 33 of its judgment in R v Hussain [2002] EWCA Crim 06; [2002] 2 Cr App R 26 page 363 at 375 of equivalent conspiracy charges: "… as we have already said, the Crown have to establish the Conspiracy Offence comprised......
  • R v Ramzan
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 21 July 2006
    ...the proceeds of drug trafficking or the proceeds of other criminal conduct. Such counts were held to be lawful in Hussain and Bhatti [2002] EWCA Crim 6; 2 Cr.App.R 26. We shall refer to them for convenience as "either/or conspiracy counts". Such counts were of obvious utility if the Crown c......
  • R v Anwoir and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 27 June 2008
    ...of Assets Recovery Agency v Olupitan [2008] EWCA Civ 104; [2008] C P Rep 421, CAR v Graham [1997] 1 Cr App R 302, CAR v Hussain [2002] EWCA Crim 6; [2002] 2 Cr App R 363, CAR v Loizou [2004] EWCA Crim 1579; [2005] 2 Cr App R 618, CAR v Montila [2004] UKHL 50; [2004] 1 WLR 3141; [2005] 1 All......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • The Fraud Act 2006: Has It Had Any Impact?
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 19 November 2008
    ...are the authorities to the effect that an agreement to commit either one or another crime, although unlikely, is possible: Hussain [2002] 2 Cr App R 26. All these were certainly issues, but the most acute which the Fraud Act 2006 was intended to remedy was the focus on the mind of the victi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT