R v Inhabitants of St. Mary Whitechapel
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1848 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Yamashita-Shinnihon Steamship Company Ltd v L'Office Cherifien des Phosphates and Unitramp SA
...is not retrospective merely because "a part of the requisites for its action is drawn from time antecedent to its passing" ( R v. Inhabitants of St Mary, Whitechapel (1848) 12 QB 120 at 127; Customs and Excise Commissioners v. Thorn Electrical Industries Ltd. [1975] 1 WLR 1661 at 1672 G).......
-
Yamashita-Shinnihon Steamship Company Ltd v L'Office Cherifien des Phosphates and Unitramp SA
...retrospectivity does not necessarily entail that the period antecedent to the statute should be left out of account. Reg. v. Inhabitants of St. Mary, Whitechapel (1848) 12 Q.B. 120 provides an example. A pauper widow had been resident with her husband in the parish of St. Mary until her hu......
-
Adampol (Pty) Ltd v Administrator, Transvaal
...v Raubenheimer NO 1917 OPD 104 at 111; Van Wyk v Rondalia 1967 (1) SA 373 (T) at 376C - F; R v Inhabitants of St Mary's White Chapel (1848) 12 QBD 120 at 127 (116 ER 811); Master Ladies' G Tailors Organisation v Minister of Labour [1950] 2 All ER 525 at 527; R v Grainger 1958 (2) SA 443 (A)......
- Guiseppe di Vittorio, The (No. 2)
Request a trial to view additional results