R v Ireland
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1910 |
| Date | 1910 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
R v Drew
...easy to resolve. That the word "conviction" is capable of more than one meaning has been recognised by the courts over many years. In R. v. Ireland (1940) 4 Cr. App. R. 74, this Court, then also concerned with a jurisdictional issue, cited an earlier decision in which it had been pointed ou......
-
Roodal v State of Trinidad and Tobago
...always speaking legislation to be construed in the world of today. This principle of construction was explained by the House of Lords in R v Ireland [1998] AC 147. How is it to be determined whether legislation is an always speaking or tied to the circumstances existing when it was passed?......
-
Marc Traylor v Kent and Medway NHS Social Care Partnership Trust
... ... Ireland [1910] 1 KB 654 the Court of Criminal Appeal (relying on the word “guilty” in the special verdict) held that the special verdict amounts to a conviction on indictment so as to give rise to a right of appeal under s3 Criminal Appeals Act 1907 ... 60 In Felstead the House of Lords ... ...
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Thornton
...this (at p.917): "That the word 'conviction' is capable of more than one meaning has been recognised by the courts over many years. In Rex v. Ireland [1910] 1 KB 654, this court, then also concerned with a jurisdictional issue, cited an earlier decision in which it had been pointed out that......
Request a trial to view additional results