R v Islington LBC ex parte Reilly
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1998 |
| Date | 1998 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Hazel Gallacher (ap) V. Stirling Council For Judicial Review Of A Decision By Stirling Council
...R v Gateshead Metopolitan Borough Council ex parte Lauder (1996) 29 HLR 360, R v London Borough of Islington ex parte Reilly (1998) 31 HLR 651, and R v Westminster London Borough Council ex parte Al-Khorsan (The Times, 21 January 2000). Those cases were all concerned with aspects of the Eng......
-
R (Ahmad) v London Borough of Newham
...of points is for some reason irrational: see R v Lambeth London Borough Council, ex p Ashley (1996) 29 HLR 385; R v Islington London Borough Council, ex p Reilly and Mannix (1998) 31 HLR 651; and R v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council, ex p Uddin (1999) 32 HLR 391. The trouble is that ......
-
R (Ahmad) v London Borough of Newham
...those differences are not important for this case. The relevant case-law 11 R v Islington London Borough Council, ex parte ReillyMannix (1998) 31 HLR 651 (“the Islington case”), a first instance case decided by me, concerned the application of an allocation scheme to secure tenants of the ......
-
R (Cali) v Waltham Forest London Borough Council
...is here concerned with a broad discretionary power conferred on the authority by Parliament. As Richards J. observed in R v Islington LBC, ex parte Reilly & Mannix [1998] 31 HLR 651 (at p665) it is not for the court to impose on the authority under the guise of judicial review, judgments t......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Caldwell Recklessness is Dead, Long Live Mens Rea's Fecklessness
...operated the latter approach: they were not o¡er ing a choice of11 Para 16, per Collins J.12 RvIslington LBC ex p Reilly & Mannix (1998) 31HLR 651; RvWestminsterCC ex p Al-Khorsan (199 9)33 HLR 7 7.13 Para20, per CollinsJ.14 S16(3), 2002 Act, inserts a new s 167(2)i nto the 1996Act.15 S167(......
-
Shareholders' Remedies Reassessed
...operated the latter approach: they were not o¡er ing a choice of11 Para 16, per Collins J.12 RvIslington LBC ex p Reilly & Mannix (1998) 31HLR 651; RvWestminsterCC ex p Al-Khorsan (199 9)33 HLR 7 7.13 Para20, per CollinsJ.14 S16(3), 2002 Act, inserts a new s 167(2)i nto the 1996Act.15 S167(......
-
From Need to Choice: R(A) v Lambeth LBC; R(Lindsay) v Lambeth LBC
...operated the latter approach: they were not o¡er ing a choice of11 Para 16, per Collins J.12 RvIslington LBC ex p Reilly & Mannix (1998) 31HLR 651; RvWestminsterCC ex p Al-Khorsan (199 9)33 HLR 7 7.13 Para20, per CollinsJ.14 S16(3), 2002 Act, inserts a new s 167(2)i nto the 1996Act.15 S167(......