R v John Turner
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1832 |
| Date | 01 January 1832 |
English Reports Citation: 168 E.R. 1298
LINCOLN'S INN
Rex
and
John Turner
S C 1 Lew C C. 119 Referred to, R. v Pym, 1846, 1 Cox C C 339, R v. Clark, 1853, 6 Cox C C 210
1832. rex t john turner (On an indictment against an accessary, a confession by the principal is not admissible in evidence to prove the guilt of the principal, it must be pro\ed uliundc, especially if the principal be alive Semble, a conviction of the principal upon a plea of guilty will not be evidence against the accessary to prove the principal guilty. Nor, semble, will a conviction on a plea of not guilty ) [S C 1 Lew C C. 119 Referred to, R. v Pym, 1846, 1 Cox C C 33(J , R v. Clark, 1853, 6 Cox C C 210 ] The prisoner was tried before Mr. Justice Patteson, at the Spring Assizes for the county of York, in the year 1832, upon an indictment which charged that the said John Turner, sixty sovereigns of the value of £60, of the goods and chattels of one Martha Clarke, by one Sarah Rich then lately before feloniously stolen, taken...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
15 cases
-
Hui Chi-ming v The Queen
... ... 333 ... Reg. v. Slack [ 1989 ] Q.B. 775 ; [ 1989 ] 3 W.L.R. 513 ; [ 1989 ] 3 All E.R. 90 , C.A ... Reg. v. Turner ( 1832 ) 1 Mood. 347 ... Reg. v. Wakely [ 1990 ] Crim.L.R. 119 , C.A ... Reg. v. Ward ( 1986 ) 85 Cr.App.R. 71 , C.A ... ...
-
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bairstow
..."greatly in point". Later, he added: "…it is the irrelevance of the outcome of the earlier trial, as illustrated by cases such as R v Turner (1832) 1 Mood. 347, that makes evidence of that outcome inadmissible." 20 In Land Securities plc v Westminster City Council [1993] 1 WLR 286 the issue......
-
Public Prosecutor v Liew Kim Choo
... ... In R v John Turner [1832] 1 Mood 347 , one Sarah Rich confessed to stealing 200 sovereigns from her employer. John Turner was charged with felonious receipt ... ...
-
S v Mhlongo; S v Nkosi
...to R v Rhodes (1960) 44 Cr App Rep 23: referred to F R v Spinks [1982] 1 All ER 587 (CA) ((1981) 74 Cr App R 263): referred to R v Turner 168 ER 1298 ((1832) 1 Mood CC 347): Surujpaul (called Dick) v R [1958] 3 All ER 300 ([1958] 1 WLR 1050): referred to. Legislation cited Statutes G The Co......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
REFLECTIONS ON S 2(2) OF SINGAPORE EVIDENCE ACT AND ROLE OF COMMON LAW RULES OF EVIDENCE
...Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd [2005] 2 SLR(R) 509 at [42]–[44]. 184 [1997] 2 SLR(R) 716 at [65]–[76]. 185 (1832) 1 Mood 347. 186 [2006] 4 SLR(R) 807 at [22]–[28]. 187 [1989] AC 1280. 188 [2008] 1 SLR(R) 601 at [42]–[43]. 189 [1916] 2 KB 658. 190 ARX v Comptroller of Inc......