R v Jones

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal
Year1918
Date1918

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
30 cases
  • Ong Kok Tan; PP
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Heron (Michael) v DPP and Attorney General for Jamaica
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 4 December 2000
    ...and the offences for which the prosecution now seeks to put him on trial. The rule of practice existing in Jamaica is that laid down in R v Jones [1918] 1 K.B. 416 where the Court held that "notwithstanding Rule, 3 of the Indictment Rules 1957, Counts charging other offences should not be ......
  • Jerome Dixon v R
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 29 July 2022
    ...wholly misconceived’. In arriving at that conclusion, it referred to the ‘rule of practice existing in Jamaica as being that laid down in R v Jones (1918) 1 KB 416 where the Court held that notwithstanding Rule 3 of the Indictment Rules 1957, Counts charging other offences should not be in......
  • R v Humphrys
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 19 May 1976
    ...Birmingham Assizes an application was made to Barry J. for leave to proceed against both men on the remaining 27 counts, Connelly (ante), R. v. Jones [1918] 1 K.B. 416, C.C.A. and Ex parte Downes (ante) being cited. Expressing himself as "quite satisfied, having read and re-read the judgmen......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1985. Part I Preliminary Sections
    • 22 November 2022
    ...(1948) 12 W.A.C.A. 377. 622 R. v. Ijoma & Ors. (1962) All N.L.R. 402. 227 R. v. Itule (1961) All N.L.R. 462. ......549 R. v. Jones (1918) 1 K.B. 416. 302 R. v. Lee (1882) 9 Q.B.D. 394. 689 R. v. Manchester Legal Aid Committee Exp. Brand(R&A) & Co. (1952) 2 D.B. 413. 582 408 People v. Hamilt......
  • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 29-1, January 1965
    • 1 January 1965
    ...C.J., AshworthandMilmo,JJ.)gave the followingpractice direction (1964, 1 W.L.R. 1244).Therule of practicelaid down in R. v. Jones (1918, 1K.B.416)andR. v. Large(1939 1AllE.R. 753; 3J.C.L. 265,419) in cases of charge ofmurderandmanslaughter respectively should, in the light ofthespeeches int......