R v Justices of Kent
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of the Queen's Bench |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
29 cases
-
General Legal Council ex parte Whitter v Frankson
...step, he may either do so in person or authorise someone else to do it on his behalf. Qui facit per alium facit per se. Thus in The Queen v The Justices of Kent (1873) LR 8 QB 305 a landowner was entitled to appeal against a rating assessment by a notice "signed by the person giving the sa......
-
London County Council v Agricultural Food Products Ltd; London County Council v Vitamins Ltd
...If It were not for authority, I should have thought this was a fatal flaw. But there are two cases which show the contrary. In The Queen v. The Justices of Kent, 1873, Law Reports 8 Queen's Bench, page 305 and France v. Dutton. 1891, 2Queen's Bench, page 208, a clerk wrote the name of the p......
-
Northwood (Solihull) Ltd v Vicky Cooke
...do so in person or authorise someone else to do it on his behalf. Qui facit per alium facit per se. Thus in R v Kent Justices (1873) LR 8 QB 305 a landowner was entitled to appeal against a rating assessment by a notice “signed by the person giving the same or by his attorney”. It was signe......
-
The Caribbean Home Insurance Company Ltd v Lynch and Thomas
...the Ministry of Works and the certifying officer being the Transport Commissioner. See also Moore v. Meville 30 W.I.R. 335R v. Kent JJ [1873] LR 8 Q.B. 305. Further the computer record and the evidence given by Mr. Ramkissoon was inadmissible by virtue of section 40(1) of the Evidence Act C......
Get Started for Free
