R v Kent Justices, ex parte Smith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1928 |
| Year | 1928 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
Re Singh Kalpanath
...Ltd [1968] 1 WLR 735; [1968] 2 All ER 270 (refd) R v Hopkins Financial Times (18 March 1989) (refd) R v Kent Justices, Ex parte Smith [1928] WN 137 (refd) R v Kent Police Authority, Ex parte Godden [1971] 2 QB 662 (refd) R v Liverpool City Justices, Ex parte Topping [1983] 1 WLR 119; [1983]......
-
R (PG) v London Borough of Ealing, The Ealing Hospital Managers and Jonathan Scott; R (G) v Ealing LBC (No 2)
...Mr Harrop-Griffiths has referred me to a number of cases which trace the practice prior to the rule changes in 1977: R v Kent JJ ex p Smith [1928] WN 137, R v Stokesley, Yorkshire, JJ ex p Bartram [1956] 1 WLR 254, George v Secretary of State for the Environment (1979) 77 LGR 689. The posit......
- Loke Wan Tho, Re an application by
-
Abagibeli Insurance Administrators (Pty) Ltd v The SA Rail Commuter Corp Ltd
...proposition that review proceedings will only be referred to oral evidence in exceptional circumstances - R v Kent Justices ex Parte Smith,1928 Wn 137. In Regina v Stokesley Yorkshire Justices ex Parte Bartram, 1956 (1) AER 563 per Lord Goddard "I do not want this to be thought to be an eas......
Get Started for Free
