R v Kent Justices, ex parte Smith

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1928
Date1928
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • R (PG) v London Borough of Ealing, The Ealing Hospital Managers and Jonathan Scott; R (G) v Ealing LBC (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 18 March 2002
    ...Harrop-Griffiths has referred me to a number of cases which trace the practice prior to the rule changes in 1977: R v Kent JJ ex p Smith [1928] WN 137, R v Stokesley, Yorkshire, JJ ex p Bartram [1956] 1 WLR 254, George v Secretary of State for the Environment (1979) 77 LGR 689. The positio......
  • Re Singh Kalpanath
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 17 March 1992
    ...Ltd [1968] 1 WLR 735; [1968] 2 All ER 270 (refd) R v Hopkins Financial Times (18 March 1989) (refd) R v Kent Justices, Ex parte Smith [1928] WN 137 (refd) R v Kent Police Authority, Ex parte Godden [1971] 2 QB 662 (refd) R v Liverpool City Justices, Ex parte Topping [1983] 1 WLR 119; [1983]......
  • Loke Wan Tho, Re an application by
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1956
  • Abagibeli Insurance Administrators (Pty) Ltd v The SA Rail Commuter Corp Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Transvaal Provincial Division
    • 23 May 2007
    ...proposition that review proceedings will only be referred to oral evidence in exceptional circumstances - R v Kent Justices ex Parte Smith,1928 Wn 137. In Regina v Stokesley Yorkshire Justices ex Parte Bartram, 1956 (1) AER 563 per Lord Goddard "I do not want this to be thought to be an eas......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT