R v Kray
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1969 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
41 cases
-
Andre Penn Claimant v 1. The Director of Public Prosecutions of the Virgin Islands 2. The Attorney General Defendants
...rights under the Constitution which protect their rights to report on criminal trials. Indeed the Court entirely agrees with Lawton J in R v Kray10 that it would not be in the public interest if newspapers were to desist from reporting on criminal trials. 74 Having said this, the Court does......
-
DPP v Anthony McCarthy and Others
...warns the jury to act only on the evidence given in court, there is no reason to suppose that they would do otherwise. In Kray (1969) 53 CR. App. R. 412 at pp. 414, 415, Lawton J. said:- 'The drama... of a trial almost always has the effect of excluding from recollection that which went bef......
-
DPP v Nevin
...warns the jury to act only on the evidence given in court, there is no reason to suppose that they would do otherwise. In Kray [1969] 53 Cr. App. R. 412 at app. 414-415 Lawton J. said:" 34 "The drama ... of a trial almost always has the effect of excluding from recollection that which went ......
-
DPP v E.C.
...the jury to act only on the evidence given in court, there is no reason to suppose that they would do otherwise. In Kray [1969] 53 Cr. App. R. 412 at pp. 414 and 415, Lawton J. said:- 'The drama ? of a trial almost always has the effect of excluding from recollection that which went before......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
The prisoners could not have that fair and impartial trial which justice demands': A fair criminal trial in 19th Century Australia
...such questioning was extremely limited in England. See Bentley, above n 12, at 96. It remains a “wholly exceptional” remedy: R v Kray (1969) 53 Cr App R 412, at 416. See also R v Andrews [1999] Crim LR 156; and R v Bunting and Wagner [2003] SASC 257, at [14]. The contrast with the approach ......
-
OPEN JUSTICE, 'BACK-TO-BACK' TRIALS AND JUROR PREJUDICE: EXAMINING THE SUPPRESSION ORDER IN THE TRIAL OF GEORGE PELL.
...J). In the United Kingdom, see, eg, Montgomery v HM Advocate (Scotland) [2003] 1 AC 641, 673-4 (Lord Hope) ('Montgomery'); R v Kray (1969) 53 Cr App R 412, 414-15 (Lawton J) ('Kray'); R v Coughlan (1976) 63 Cr App R 33, 37 (Lawton LJ); R v Cannan (1991) 92 Cr App R 16, 22, 24 (Lord Lane CJ)......
-
Privy Council
...media reporting: see, for example, Boodram, especiallyin the Court of Appeal (1994) 47 WIR 459 and, in the domestic context,R vKray (1969) 53 Cr App R 412 and R vWest [1996] 2 Cr App R 374;though the distinctions drawn in Attorney-General vTimes Newspapers(The Times, 12 February 1983) might......