R v Lambeth Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte McComb
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1982 |
| Year | 1982 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Dannenberg
...not fall within the scope of such matters. Lord Justice Brandon at page 546 expressed no concluded view. 14 In R. v. Lambeth Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte McComb, 1983, Q.B., 551, the Divisional Court refused an application for a declaration against the Director of Public P......
-
Cuoghi v Governor of Brixton Prison
...in Bonalumi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1985] QB 675, R v Lambeth Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte McComb [1983] QB 551, and In re O ( Restraint Order: Disclosure of Assets) [1991] 2 QB 520. He refers to those authorities to support his central contention t......
-
The Queen (on the Application of Guardian News and Media Ltd) (Appellant Claimant) v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court (Respondent Defendant) The Government of the United States of America (Interested Party)
...jurisdiction under section 31(1)(a) in an even more opaque state than it was after Green [1976] QB 11. 21 In R v Lambeth Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate ex p McComb [1983] QB 551, both members of the Court of Appeal, Sir John Donaldson MR and May LJ, expressed the view that Green [1976]......
-
Re Smalley
...for the respondents, Mr. Laws invited us to overrule it. He drew our attention to the doubts expressed in Reg. v. Lambeth Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex Parte McComb [1983] 1 Q.B. 551, by Sir John Donaldson M.R., at p. 563 and by May L.J., at p. 567 as to whether Green's case had b......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Court of Appeal
...530, but his remarks were obiterand the other two members of the court expressly refrained fromstating their opinion. In Ex parte McComb[1983]Q.B. 551, it wasstated that Lord Denning's view was a misinterpretation ofAmand'scase, as he had ignored the preceding sentence in ViscountSimon L. C......