R v Lancashire Justices. Re Tyson's Appeal
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Court of the Queen's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Power Supermarkets Ltd, Application of
...Donegal Justices [1903] 2 I.R. 533; (1902) 36 I.L.T.R. 184, 229; (1902) 3 N.I.J.R. 26. R. v. Lancashire Justices, Re Tyson's Appeal (1870) L.R. 6 Q.B. 97; 40 L.J.M.C. 17; 23 L.T. 461; 3 J.P. 170; 19 W.R. 204. R. (Henderson) v. Louth Justices [1911] 2 I.R. 312; 45 I.L.T.R. 8, 73. The State (......
-
Moxam v Liquor Licensing Bd
...A.C. 563; [1996] 1 All E.R. 1, observations of Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead applied. (2) -R. v. Lancashire JJ., In re Tyson”s AppealELR(1870), L.R. 6 Q.B. 97; 40 L.J.M.C. 17, considered. (3) -Sharp v. WakefieldELR, [1891] A.C. 173; sub nom. Sharpe v. Wakefield, [1886–90] All E.R. Rep. 651; (......
-
Macquet v Barrett NO
...have given indicate why it is that they cannot be accepted. I think the two cases relied on, namely The Queen v the Justices of Lancashire (6 Q.B. 97) and In re T. H. Green (1909, N.L.R. 227) are distinguishable on the ground that the legislation there in question is different from the legi......
-
Macquet v Barrett NO
...temporary liquor licences and wine farmers' licences. See also Julius's case (suprf!.·, at pp. 226, 231, 235, 224); Rex v. Lancashire L.R. (6 Q.B. 97 at p. 99); In re Green (1909, N.L.R. 227). If the respondent has a discretion, general consideration of necessity may be taken into account. ......