R v Law Society, ex parte Ingman Foods Oy AB
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1997 |
| Year | 1997 |
| Court | QBD (Crown Office List) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Re Ahmed & Company
...exercise of discretion: ibid. See also R v Law Society, ex p Reigate Projects Ltd [1993] 1 WLR 1531, at 1543–1544; R v Law Society, ex p Ingman Foods Oy Ab [1997] 2 All ER 666; R v The Law Society, ex. p. Nielsen, December 3, 1998, unreptd.; The Mortgage Corporation v Law Society, Decembe......
-
Fortisbank Sa and Trenwick International Ltd and Others
... ... Sharrock was informed that it was Fortis' intention to obtain ex parte injunctions against the company and certain directors of it. The first ... ...
-
Law Society v Sephton & Company (A Firm)
...is exercised on rational and intelligible grounds: see R v Law Society, ex p Mortgage Express Ltd. [1997] 2 All ER 348 and R v Law Society, ex p Ingman Foods Oy AB [1997] 2 All ER 666. In the former case, the Society exercised its discretion to limit the payment of compensation to that pa......
-
Law Society v Sephton & Company (A Firm)
...Thus, the Society may form the view that the client was very substantially to blame for the misappropriation—as in R The Law Society ex parte Ingman Foods Oy AB [1997] 2 All ER 666. Or there might be insufficient monies in the Fund to meet all claims, so that the Society decides not to meet......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Mortal dangers, moral hazard and mortgage lending by solicitors: an international perspective
...Fund Rules 1995). An example of anunsuccessful judicial review of a refusal on such grounds isR v Law Society ex p Ingman Foods [1997] 2 All ER 666, acase involving an advance fee fraud.(131) As long ago as 1900, a speaker at a Liverpool Law Societydebate regarding a possible insurance or g......