R v Lee
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 07 July 1992 |
| Date | 07 July 1992 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
R v Manchester Crown Court, ex parte H. (A Minor)
...applications for judicial review in relation to orders made under section 39. The only Court of Appeal decision on the subject is Lee 96 Cr.App.R 188 which held that there was such 12Miss Baird referred to a decision of the Divisional Court (differently constituted) in R -v- Harrow Crown C......
-
R v William Cornick
...8, that the rights of the Press and public under Article 10 should be trumped by the welfare of the child. Furthermore, the decision in R v Lee (a minor) [1993] 1 WLR 103 is authority for the proposition that the mere fact that the accused or convicted party is under 18 is not of itself a s......
- R v Central Criminal Court, ex parte W
-
JC and RT v The Central Criminal Court
...proceedings continues to be a young person as defined in the Act.” 20 It is also clear that s. 39 has been strictly construed. In R v Lee (Anthony William), [1993] 1 WLR 103, a child defendant was tried and convicted on two indictments, with the benefit of separate orders under s. 39. The ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Naming Child Defendants: In the Public Interest?
...roundly refuted in the pre-ss.4A context, prominently by the Court of Appeal, reconstituting itself as a Divisional Court, in R v Lee [1993] 2 All ER 170, with Lloyd LJ stating:There is nothing in s.39 about rare or exceptional cases. There must, of course, be a good reason for making an or......