R v Lee
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1882 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Frome United Breweries Company v Bath Justices
...he has made himself a party he cannot sit or act as a judge, and if he does so the decision of the whole body will be vitiated. Thus, in The Queen v. Lee (1882, L.R. 9 Q.B.D. 394), where a member of the sanitary committee of a Town Council who had taken part in directing a prosecution sat ......
-
Marlin v Durban Turf Club and Others
...the mind of a reasonable man a suspicion that he may have a bias. See Rex v Sunderland Justices (1901, 2 K.B. 357 at p. 364); Rex v Lee (9 Q.B.D. 394 at p. 396); Rex v Henley (1892, 1 Q.B.D. 504 at p. 506); Law's case (supra); Cooper v Wilson (1937, A.E.R., vol. 2, par. 726 at p. 742; 1937 ......
-
Everley Nelson v The Labour Tribunal
...and Justices for County Borough of Bath [1926] AC 586 ; The Queen on the Prosecution of Shaw v Lee and others, Justices of Wakefield (1882) 9 QBD 394; Cooper v Wilson and Others [1937] 2 K.B. 10 (1971) 70 LGR 27 at p. 35. ...
-
WIJERAMA v. PAUL
...the reason why the Queen's Bench Division held that they assumed the double role of prosecutors and judges. In the case of R. v. Lee2 (1882) 9 Q. B. D. 394 the position was the same as in Milledge except that there only one member of the sanitary committee sat 1 (1879) 4 Q. B. D. 332. 2 (18......
Request a trial to view additional results