R v Lee Kun
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
| Date | 1916 |
| Year | 1916 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
69 cases
- R v Kunnath (R)
-
United States v Delisser
...[186173] All E.R. Rep. 770; (1873), 12 Cox, C.C. 551. (2) R. v. GuerinUNK(1888), 58 L.J.M.C. 42; 16 Cox, C.C. 596. (3) R. v. Lee Kun, [1916] 1 K.B. 337; [191415] All E.R. Rep. 603; (1915), 11 Cr. App. R. 293, observations of Lord Reading, C.J. applied. Legislation construed: Criminal Proced......
-
R. v. Tran (Q.D.)
...460; 67 N.R. 1, refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Kwok Leung (1909), 4 Hong Kong L.R. 161 (Full Ct.), refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Lee Kun, [1916] 1 K.B. 337 (C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Kunnath (R.), [1993] 4 All E.R. 30; 156 N.R. 75 (P.C.), refd to. [para. 18]. Negron v. New York (1970), 4......
-
R. v. Tran (Q.D.)
...460; 67 N.R. 1, refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Kwok Leung (1909), 4 Hong Kong L.R. 161 (Full Ct.), refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Lee Kun, [1916] 1 K.B. 337 (C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Kunnath (R.), [1993] 4 All E.R. 30; 156 N.R. 75 (P.C.), refd to. [para. 18]. Negron v. New York (1970), 4......
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Cases referred to in 1983
...105 R. v. Harris (1836) 7 C & P 446. 229 R. v. Harrison (1951) 1 K.B. 107. 70 R. v. Kahiski (1967) 2 All E.R. 398. 105 R. v. Lee Kun (1916) 1 K.B. 337. 105 R. v. Mitchel (1848) 3 Cox C.C. 93. 70 R. v. Patel (1951) 2 All E.R. 29. 86 R. v. Rivett (1950) 34 Cr. App. R. 87 281 Rainy v. Bravo (1......
-
Preliminary Sections
...18 L.J.M.C. 198; 13 L.T.O.S. 551; 13 J.P. 425; 13 Jur. 545. 296 R. v. Lawson 36 Crim App R. 30; (1952) 1 T.L.R. 889 48 R. v. Lee Kun, (1916) 1 K.B. 337; 85 L.J.K.B. 515; 114 L.T. 421; 80 J.P. 116; 32 T.L.R. 225; 60 Sol. Jo. 158; 25 Cox C.C. 304; 11 Crim. App. R. 293. 187 R. v. Lesbini, 24 C......
-
The interpretation and application of the right to effective participation
...relation to children. The caseconcerned the high-profile trial of Robert Thompson and Jon Venables for the murder of James Bulger in8. [1916] 1 KB 337.9. Ibid. at 341.10. See Stanford vUK App no 16757/90 (ECHR, 23 February 1994) at [26].11. Ibid. at [26].12. Ibid. at [26]. See also Colozza ......
-
Guilty of being deaf. Kruse v S — paying lip service to the fair-trial rights of hearing-impaired accused persons
...stice: see R v Tran 105 SO 386 (Ala 1925).92 Etienne d u Toit et al Commentary on th e Criminal Pro cedure Act (2015) 13-5; R v Lee Kun [1916] 1 KB 337 (CCA) at 341–2.93 Kruse v S supra note 7 p ara 6. 94 Relyea op cit note 6at 868.95 Kruse v S supra note 7 p ara 23. 96 De Meulder op cit n......
Get Started for Free