R v Legislative Committee of the Church Assembly, ex parte Haynes-Smith

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1928
Year1928
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
29 cases
  • Oriental Rubber and Oil Palms Sdn Bhd v Pemungut Hasil Tanah, Kuantan
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1983
  • Pemungut Hasil Tanah, Kuantan; Tan Oon and Others v; Re Application of Tan Oon and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1985
  • Ridge v Baldwin
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • Invalid date
    ... ... of chief constable - Power of watch committee to dismiss for misconduct - Exercise of power - ... Hendon Rural District Council, Ex parte Chorley F2 ; Reg. v. Manchester Legal Aid ... Legislative Committee of the Church Assembly, Ex parte Haynes ... of the Church Assembly, Ex parte Haynes-Smith. F76 There it was sought to prohibit the ... ...
  • Ridge (A.P.) v Baldwin and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 March 1963
    ...writs." 28 A gloss was put on this by Lord Hewart, CJ. in Rex v. Legislative Committee of the Church Assembly.Ex parte Haynes-Smith [1928] 1 K.B. 411. There it was sought to prohibit the Assembly from proceeding further with the Prayer Book Measure, 1927. That seems to me to have no resembl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • RENOVATING JUDICIAL REVIEW.
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal No. 68, January 2017
    • 1 January 2017
    ...Jams v Associated Medical Services Inc, [1964] SCR 497, 44 DLR (2d) 407. (30) See e.g. R v Legislative Committee of the Church Assembly, [1928] 1 KB 411; British Columbia (Labour Relations Board) v Traders Services Ltd, [1958] SCR 672, 15 DLR (2d) 305; Calgary Power v Copithome, [1959] SCR ......
  • Judicial attitudes to judicial review: a comparative examination of justifications offered for restricting the scope of judicial review in Australia, Canada and England.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 34 No. 1, April 2010
    • 1 April 2010
    ...Law, above n 10, 215-16. (57) [1924] 1 KB 171, 205. (58) R v Legislative Committee of the Church Assembly; Ex parte Haynes-Smith [1928] 1 KB 411, 415 (Lord Hewart (59) Aronson, Dyer and Groves, above n 12, 415-16 (citations omitted). See also Martin Loughlin, "Procedural Fairness: A Study o......
  • Contractual Discretion and Administrative Discretion: A Unified Analysis
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 68-4, July 2005
    • 1 July 2005
    ...[1924] 1 KB 171, 204^205),interpreted by Lord Hewart LCJ in RvLegislative Com-mitteeof the ChurchAssembly, exparte Haynes-Smith[1928]1 KB 411to mean that bodies not classi¢-able as ‘judicial’by reference to other criter ia were not covered.Thi s led in eg Nakkuda vJayaratne[1951] AC 66 (PC)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT