R v Lesbini

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1914
Year1914

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • Public Prosecutor v KK
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2007
  • Dick et Al v R
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • 8 May 1985
    ...a formidable degree of forensic and judicial learning, going back to the nineteenth century to R. v. Hayward (1833) 6 C. & P. 157, through R v. Lesbini [1914] 3 K.B. 1116 and Holmes v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1946] A.C. 588, and encompassing the quintessential R v. Duffy [1949] 1 A......
  • R v Smith (Morgan James)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 27 July 2000
    ...p.9 "The test to be applied is that of the effect of the provocation on a reasonable man, as laid down by the Court of Criminal Appeal in R v Lesbini, so that an unusually excitable or pugnacious individual is not entitled to rely on provocation which would not have led an ordinary person t......
  • Holley v AG
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 15 June 2005
    ...of an anti-semitic slur which, it seems, had provoked the defendant but would not have provoked a reasonable person who was not Jewish. R v Lesbini was approved by the House in Mancini, above, a case in which the defendant relied on self-defence and the evidence of provocation appears to ha......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Descent into Murder: Provocation's Stricture—The Prognosis for Women Who Kill Men Who Abuse Them
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 71-4, August 2007
    • 1 August 2007
    ...concept of proportionality is nevertheless still an important factual element inthe objective inquiry’ (at 712–13). See also R v Lesbini [1914] 3 KB 1116. 344 Provocation’s Stricture—The Prognosis for Women Who Kill Men Who Abuse for self-control and ruling that it is fixed (following Holle......
  • What Future for Voluntary Manslaughter?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 68-3, June 2004
    • 1 June 2004
    ...Partial Excuses to Murder (Gaunt: 1991) 19–20.4 Law Com. Consultation Paper No. 173, paras 4.163–4.164.5 See Avory J, in R v Lesbini [1914] 3 KB 1116 at 1118.6 Law Com. Consultation Paper No. 173, para. 4.8. The Judicial Studies specimen direction to the jury (April 2003) as to the ‘special......
  • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 18-3, July 1954
    • 1 July 1954
    ...to be applied isthatoftheeffect oftheprovocationon a reasonable man, as was laid down by theCourtof CriminalAppeal in R. v. Lesbini (1914 3K.B.1116) sothatan unusuallyexcitable or pugnacious individual isnotentitled to rely onprovocation which wouldnothave led an ordinary person toact as he......