R v Lewis (Justin)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2016] EWCA Crim 1020
Date2016
Year2016
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • R v Lee (Also known as Mandy) Davidoff
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 26 September 2022
    ...offence, and that no order was required if it merely duplicated another scheme to which the offender was already subject. (4) Lewis [2016] EWCA Crim 1020; [2017] 1 Cr App R (S) 2 – in which it was concluded that it is not enough for the Crown to assert that a prohibition is necessary on a......
  • R v Piotr Sokolowski
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 17 November 2017
    ...(as he then was), in Smith [2011] EWCA Crim 1772; [2012] Cr App R (S) 82 (a case which concerned SOPOs), but more recently in Lewis [2016] EWCA Crim 1020; [2017] 1 Cr App R (S) 2 and McLellan and Bingley [2017] EWCA Crim 1464 (which, in effect, applied the observations in Smith to SHPOs), s......
  • R v Robert Beedle
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 3 October 2019
    ...was imposed in breach, in a number of respects, of the guidance given in the combination of Smith (Steven) [2012] 1 WLR 1316; Lewis [2017] 1 Cr.App.R (S) 2; McLellan [2018] 1 WLR 2969 at paragraphs 25 and 26; and R v Piotr Sokolowski [2018] 4 WLR 126 at paragraph 3 The facts can be shor......
  • R v David Hammond
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 28 September 2022
    ...said that it is not legitimate to impose multiple prohibitions on a defendant just in case he might commit a different type of offence. In R v Lewis [2016] EWCA Crim 1020, the court confirmed that where a defendant had been convicted of viewing child pornography, an SHPO preventing contact......
1 books & journal articles
  • In court
    • United Kingdom
    • Probation Journal No. 64-2, June 2017
    • 1 June 2017
    ...all why notificationrequirements and the length of time during which an order of this nature will runshould be the same’.R v LEWIS, [2017] 1 Cr App R (S) 2.Assault by penetration: Guideline and ‘dangerousness’Following a night out with her friends the victim, a young woman at university, ha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT