R v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham ex parte NALGO

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1991
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • AAA (Syria) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 19 December 2022
    ...its members' terms and conditions of work: see/compare, the facts in R v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham ex parte NALGO [1991] IRLR 249, per Nolan LJ at paragraphs 25 – 28. That is not this case. The PCSU's members are not “directly affected” by the Rwanda policy in any sense relev......
  • Good Law Project Ltd v The Prime Minister
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 15 February 2022
    ...see McClaren v Home Office [1990] ICR 824 per Woolf LJ at page 837B-D, and R v London Borough Hammersmith and Fulham, ex p. NALGO [1991] IRLR 249 per Nolan LJ at paragraphs 25–28. B. Is the challenge academic? 7 The first preliminary point is that because each of the appointments challenged......
  • R v South Bank University ex parte Coggeran
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 6 June 2000
    ...I disagree. 64 On this point I have been referred to a number of authorities: R v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham ex p NALGO [1991] IRLR 249; R v Bradford MBC ex p Ali [1994] ELR 299; and Anyanwu v South Bank Students' Union [2000] IRLR 36. None of these authorities supports the su......
  • R Public and Commercial Services Union v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 20 June 2008
    ...the Secretary of State says by reference, for example, to the decision in R v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, ex parte NALGO [1991] IRLR 249, that something much more general is required. She refers to the extract cited by Nolan LJ in the Divisional Court from what Woolf LJ said i......
1 books & journal articles
  • Seymour–Smith: Problems in Procedures and Proof
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 60-1, January 1997
    • 1 January 1997
    ...I-2433, [1990] 3 WLR 818.16 This also seems to be the approach of the courts in cases such as RvLondon Borough of Fulham, ex pNALGO [1991] IRLR 249, in terms of the types of remedies available.The Modern Law Review [Vol. 60112 The Modern Law Review Limited implicitly recognised this point: ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT