R v London Residuary Body, ex parte Inner London Education Authority

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1987
Date1987
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • [1] George Allert (Administrator of the Estate of George Gordon Matheson, deceased) [2] George Allert [3] Edmund Allert [4] Anthony Allert [5] Mary Glennie Allert [6] Pearl Allert Appellants v [1] Joshua Matheson [2] Madeline Matheson Respondents
    • Grenada
    • Court of Appeal (Grenada)
    • 24 November 2014
    ...the issue now raised for the first time. …. I respectfully agree with the observations of Ralph LJ in Bird v Birds Eye Walls Ltd., The Times, 24 July 1987 when he indicated that a defendant should be relieved of an admission and allowed to withdraw it or amend it "if in all the circumstance......
  • Enda Watson v Trevor Officer & Joslyn Laing
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 8 October 2003
    ...factor in determining whether the defence should be struck out; (5) it was wrong to apply the test in Bird v. Birds Eye Walls Ltd., The Times, 24 July 1987, alternatively, if it was, the right test, the judge erred in holding that it was unjust to permit the defendants to resile from their ......
  • R v Secretary of State for Education and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 12 April 1995
    ...JJ) in ( R v London Residuary Body, ex parte Inner London Education Authority 3 July 1987, unreported save briefly but accurately in The Times 24 July 1987). It is still, so far as I know, the only reasoned judgment of the English courts on error of fact as a ground of judicial review and, ......
  • Gale v Superdrug Stores Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 April 1996
    ...of the Supreme Court Practice refers to the decision in this court of Bird v Birds Eye Walls Ltd on 21 July 1987 reported only in the Times for 24 July 1987. Since that was a case which featured prominently in argument both before the judge and in this appeal, it will be necessary to refer ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT