R v Lord Chancellor, ex parte Child Poverty Action Group

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Judgment Date06 February 1998
Date06 February 1998

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
89 cases
  • Village Residents Association Ltd v an Bord Pleanála (No 2)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 23 March 2000
    ...to the jurisdiction vested in the English High Court which was recognised by Dyson J. in R. -v- Lord Chancellor. ex p. CPAG, [1998] 2 All E.R. 755 and that this is an appropriate case in which to make an order pre-empting the making of an order for costs against the Applicant in favour of a......
  • McEvoy v Meath County Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 24 January 2003
    ...interest in this case.., it does not involve issues of considerable public importance.” 8 In Regina v. Lord Chancellor ,exP; CPAG [1999] 1 W.L.R. 347 Dyson J., dealing with the jurisdiction to make a pre-emptive costs order acknowledged that there was a distinction to be made between ordina......
  • McEvoy v Meath County Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 24 January 2003
    ...COUNCIL (UDC) & DUNNES STORES LTD UNREP SUPREME 16.5.2002 RSC O.99 r1(1) RSC O.99 r1(4) R V LORD CHANCELLOR EX-PARTE CPAG 1998 2 AER 755 1999 1 WLR 347 LANCEFORT LTD V BORD PLEANALA (NO 2) 1999 2 IR 270 1 JUDGMENT of Quirke J. delivered the 24th day of January, 2003. 2 Having delivered ju......
  • Friends of the Curragh Environment Ltd v Trustees of the Turf Club
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 14 July 2006
    ...costs order Criteria for determining application - Whether issues of general public importance raised - Reg v Lord Chancellor, ex p CPAG [1999] 1 WLR 347 and R (Corner House) v Trade and Industry Secretary [2005] EWCA Civ 192, [2005] 1 WLR 2600 followed; Village Residents Association Ltd v ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Using equality legislation as a sword
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Discrimination and the Law No. 16-2-3, June 2016
    • 1 June 2016
    ...probably have to abandon the proceed-ings without the order. The PCO’s inception was R v Lord Chancellor ex p Child PovertyAction Group [1999] 1 WLR 347 [358], and the governing principles were set out in R (CornerHouse Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 1......
  • Protective Expenses Orders and public interest litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh Law Review No. , January 2015
    • 1 January 2015
    ...public law cases was considered further in two cases reported together as R v Lord Chancellor, ex parte Child Poverty Action Group.2020[1999] 1 WLR 347. In the first case, the Child Poverty Action Group sought judicial review of a decision of the Lord Chancellor refusing legal aid in cases ......