R v Louise P
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 27 November 2001 |
| Neutral Citation | [2001] EWCA Crim 2664 |
| Date | 27 November 2001 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Ward v DPP
...& OFFENSIVE WEAPONS ACT 1990 S3(2) R v HANCOCK 1932 23 CR APP R 16 R v HEYES 1951 1 KB 29 1950 2 AER 587 1950 34 CR APP R 161 R v POOLE 2002 1 WLR 1528 2002 2 CR APP R 13 R v MCPEAKE 2006 CRIM LR 376 2005 EWCA CRIM 3162 DPP v DAVIS 1993 2 IR 1 1993 ILRM 407 1992/11/3499 DPP v NALLY 2007 4......
-
Hksar v Tsang Yam Kuen, Donald
...or real danger (the two being the same), that the tribunal was biased. This test was applied by the Court of Appeal in R v Poole [2002] 1 WLR 1528. In Szeypusz v UK [2010] ECHR 1323, the European Court of Human Rights said that the impartiality of a jury must be subjectively and objectively......
-
R v MURTAZA HASHAN Alexander NAZHAM and HAMEED Ahmed EUGENE NAZHEM
...grounds for maintaining that a fair trial could not take place. As to the taking of the verdicts the decision of this court in Poole [2001] EWCA Crim 2664 makes it perfectly plain that in the circumstances it was appropriate not to take a verdict from the jury, and the procedure was upheld.......
-
香港特別行政區 訴 梁天琦及另三人
...title id="_ftn6" onclick="Javascript:void(0)" style="color=black;">[6] 見註腳2。 [7] [1748] 20 St Jr 1191, 1231。 [8] [2002] 2 AC 357。 [9] [2002] 1 WLR 1528。 [10] [2008] UKHL [11] (2016) 19 HKCFAR 679。 [12] (1973) 57 Cr App R 632。 [13]...