R v Mazo
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1997 |
| Date | 1997 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
R v Kendrick
...leave was granted by the Full Court on 12th November 1996 in the light of another judgment of this Court on 19th January 1996 in the case of Mazo, reported only in the June volume of the Criminal Law Review 1996 at page 435. Hobhouse LJ, in giving the judgment of the Full Court granting lea......
-
R v Hinks (Karen Maria)
...an entirely appropriate and accurate direction as to dishonesty." 69 It is also apparent from the judgments of the Court of Appeal in Reg. v. Mazo [1997] 2 Cr.App.R. 518 and Reg. v. Kendrick and Hopkins [1997] 2 Cr.App.R. 524 that difficult issues can arise both as to appropriation and dish......
-
R v Hinks (Karen Maria)
...be convicted of theft. 29 In support of that proposition, he relies upon a decision of a differently constituted division of this Court in R v Mazo [1997] 2 Cr App R 518. In particular, he refers to a passage in the judgment of Pill LJ, giving the judgment of the Court, starting at page 520......
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...2 Cr App R 524, [1997] Crim LR 359, CA 291, 303 R v Konzani [2005] EWCA Crim 706, [2005] All ER (D) 292 (Mar) 338 R v Mazo (Ellen) [1997] 2 Cr App R 518, [1996] Crim LR 435, CA 291, 301, 303, 305, 310, 313 R v McIlkenny, Hill, Power, Walker, Hunter and Callaghan [1992] 2 All ER 417, (1991) ......
-
Dishonest Appropriation after Gomez and Hinks
...weakness would have made Dolphin incapable13 Thus applying R v Kendrick and Hopkins [1997] 2 Cr App R 524, CA and overrulingR v Mazo [1997] 2 Cr App R 518, CA.14 [2001] 2 AC 241 at 251.15 If the gifts were avoided for undue influence, Dolphin would then have arestitutionary claim against K......
-
Restricting the Meaning of 'Appropriation' under the Theft Act 1968 - A Cool, Calm and Rational Approach to the Issue of 'Stealing' A Perfectly Valid Gift Lord Hobhouse's Dissent in R v Hinks [2000] UKHL 53, [2001] 2 AC 241
...the 5 R v Morris [1984] AC 320. 6 Lawrence v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1972] AC 626. 7 R v Gomez [1993] AC 442. 8 R v Mazo [1997] 2 Cr App R 518. 9 R v Hopkins and Kendrick [1997] Crim LR 359. 10 Halpin, A, Definition in the Criminal Law (Hart Publishing, 1st edn, 2004), p 167. 292 ......