R v Mendip District Council, ex parte Fabre
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
138 cases
-
Michael Mansell v Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council
...council members "who, by virtue of that membership, may be expected to have a substantial local and background knowledge" ( R v Mendip District Council ex parte Fabre (2000) 80 P & CR 500, per Sullivan J as he then was). That background knowledge includes "a working knowledge of the statut......
-
Mr Gary Sharp and Others v Chelmsford City Council Environment Agency (Interested Party)
...not accept these submissions. I was reminded of the approach to the proper reading of an officer's report to committee, in R v Mendip District Counsel ex parte Fabre (2000) 80 P & CR 500 at page 509, which I accept as correct and applicable, Sullivan J said that an officer's report was addr......
-
The Queen (on the Application of Peter Evans) v Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Victacress Salads Ltd (Interested Party)
...thereafter are left uncorrected at the meeting of the planning committee before the relevant decision is taken." (page 9). 103 In R v Mendip District Council (200) 80 P C. R. 500 Sullivan J, as he then was, considered the question of the circumstances in which there is a duty to give reason......
-
R Susan Suliman v Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council
... [2011] UKSC 2, at paragraph 36, and the judgment of Sullivan J., as he then was, in R. v Mendip District Council, ex parte Fabre (2000) 80 P. & C.R. 500, at p.509). Unless there is evidence to suggest otherwise, it may reasonably be assumed that, if the members followed the officer's recom......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Appeals and Review of Planning Decisions
...CC [2011] UKSC 2 at [36], and the judgment of Sullivan J, as he then was, in R. v Mendip DC Ex p. Fabre [2017] P.T.S.R. 1112; (2000) 80 P.& C.R. 500 at 509). Unless there is evidence to suggest otherwise, it may reasonably be assumed that, if the members followed the officer’s recommendatio......