R v Metharam
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1961 |
Year | 1961 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
R v Cunningham
...The definition of grievous bodily harm means "really serious bodily harm" in current English usage ( D.P.P. v. Smith [1961] A.C. 290, R. v. Metharam [1961] 3 All E.R. 200, Hyam v. D.P.P., supra, at p.68), all disapproving ( R. v. Ashman 1 F. & F. 8Counsel for the appellant understandably......
-
The Queen v Kristy Louise McGuckin
...R v Donnally (1779) 1 Leach 193 ; 168 ER 199 R v Hutchinson (1784) 1 Leach 339 ; 168 ER 273 R v Massey [2000] ACTSC 107 R v Metharam [1961] 3 All ER 200 R v Mulcahy [2010] ACTSC 98 R v Williams (1877) 14 Cox CC 59 Williams v R (1990) 50 A Crim R 213 R v Whitely (1991) 93 Cr App R 25 Smith v......
-
People (Attorney General) v Messitt
...I agree. FitzGerald J.:— I agree. 1 (1848) 3 Cox C.C. 441. 2 (1849) 3 Cox C.C. 442. 3 (1838) 8 C. & P. 635. 4 (1837) 8 C. & P. 173. 5 [1961] 3 All E.R. 200. 6 [1961] A.C. 290. 7 (1830) 1 Mood. C.C. 278. 8 (1836) 1 Mood. & R. 526. 9 (1834) 6 C. & P. 684. 10 (1831) 4 C. & P. 446. 11 (1831) 4 ......
1 books & journal articles
-
Being Informed: The Complexities of Knowledge, Deception and Consent When Transmitting HIV
...172 ER 1419 and R vM’Loughlin(1838) 173 ER 651.15 Grievous bodily harm is considered to be ‘really serious harm’ (see R vMetheram[1961] 3 All ER 200) and the totality of injuries can be combined for the term‘grievous’: R vGrundy [1977] Crim LR 543.16 (1888) 22 QBD 23.17 Ibid. at 41, per Ste......