R v Middlesex Justices, ex parte Bond
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1933 |
| Date | 1933 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
- Daito Kogyo (Sarawak) Sdn Bhd v Port Dickson Land Development Sdn Bhd
- Thien Kon Thai v Haji Lassim Abdul Rahman
- Sunlite Textile Sdn Bhd v Motilal Realty Sdn Bhd (Part.2)
-
Hines v Birkbeck College (No. 2)
...the same relief based on the same cause of action even if new facts or law have subsequently come to light." 9 He also referred to R. v. Middlesex Justices, ex parte Bond [1933] 2 K.B. 1, which is authority for the proposition that a dismissal for want of jurisdiction gives rise to a res ju......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Courts of Summary Jurisdiction
...seeking to adduce it. Consider-ation wasthengiven totheobservations of Scrutton L.J.,in R. v. Middlesex Justices Ex parte Bond(1933,2K.B.1) :"Itis quite clearthatjustices can upon fresh evidence alter,varyor dischargetheordertheyhadpreviouslymade...Butitappears to me quite clearthatthejusti......