R v Nat Bell Liquors Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1922 |
| Date | 1922 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
174 cases
-
Davies v Price
...16 That principle is I think well known and it is enough to refer to a short passage in Lord Sumner's well known Judgment in Rex v. Nat Bell Liquors Limited., reported in 1922 2 Appeal Cases at page 128, the passage in question being at page 151. He said this: "It has been said that the mat......
- R v Agricultural Land Tribunal for South Eastern Area (ex parte Bracey)
-
Re Mohamed Saleem Ismail
...or officer which or who had been statutorily entrusted to make the decision.That supervision was elaborated in R v Nat Bell Liquors Ltd [1922] 2 AC 128 in the following passage at p 156 cited with approval in the famous case of Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147......
-
The Institute of Jamaica v The Industrial Disputes Tribunal, Beecher (Coleen)
...and conditions of its exercise; the other is the observance of the law in the course of its exercise.' R.v. Nat Bell Liquors, Ltd. [1922] 2 A.C. 128 at p. 156; [1922] All E.R. Rep. 335 at p. 351. It is simply an enforcement of Parliament's mandate to the tribunal. If the tribunal is intende......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
RENOVATING JUDICIAL REVIEW.
...Administrative Law and Judicial Deference (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2016) chapters 3 and 5. (27) See, e.g. Rex v Nat Bell Liquors, Ltd, [1922] 2 AC 128 (28) Loughlin, supra note 26; Dyzenhaus, "Formalism's Hollow Victory" supra note 26 at 527; David Dyzenhaus, "Constituting the Rule of Law:......
-
The Scope of Section 75(V) of the Constitution: Why Injunction but no Certiorari?
...Press, 2013) vol 1, 169, 171–3. 40 Overseers of the Poor of Walsall v London and North Western R ailway Co (1878) 4 App Case 30, 40. 41 [1922] 2 AC 128, 155–6. 42 (2010) 239 CLR 531, 567–8. 43 (2010) 239 CLR 531, 571 [65]. ____________________________________________________________________......
-
Why These Three? the Significance of the Selection of Remedies in Section 75(V) of the Australian Constitution
...See Gummow, above n 10; Walsall Overseers v London and North Western Railway Co (No 1) (1878) 4 AC 30, 40; R v Nat Bell Liquors Ltd [1922] 2 AC 128, 155–6. 54 Rubinstein traces the use of no-certiorari clauses to the early 18th century: Amnon Rubinstein, Jurisdiction and Illegality: A Study......
-
The effect of alcohol on the Canadian Constitution ... seriously.
...(AG) v Canada Temperance Federation, [1946] AC 193, 2 DLR 1 [Canada Temperance Federation cited to AC]. (8) v Nar Bell Liquors Ltd, [1922] 2 AC 128, 65 DLR 1 [Nat Bell cited to (9) Consolidated Distilleries Ltd v The King, [1933] AC 508, 3 DLR 1. (10) Canadian Pacific Wine Co v Tuley, [1921......