R v Newcastle-upon-Tyne Justices, ex parte Hindle

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1984
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Chew (Police Inspector) v Gray
    • Bermuda
    • Court of Appeal (Bermuda)
    • 25 October 1985
    ...judgment: R v DurrantUNK [1969] 3 All ER 1357 Rowlands v HamiltonUNK [1971] 1 All ER 1089 R v Newcastle Justices ex parte HindleUNK [1984] 1 All ER 770 Dawson v LunnTLR Times 13 December 1984 R v Moreau (1978) 89 DLR (3rd) 449 R v Davis (1973) 14 CCC (2nd) 513 R v Gallagher (1981) 64 CCC (2......
  • Moonan v The Director of Public Prosecutions et Al
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 19 July 1991
    ...considered, the course and conduct pursued by the D.P.P. did indeed amount to an abuse of the process of the court R v. Newcastle-upon-Tyne Justices, ex parte Hindle [1984] 1 All E.R. 770 at p.782). I agree with the comments of the trial judge about the manner in which the D.P.P. approached......
  • Chew v Gray
    • Bermuda
    • Court of Appeal (Bermuda)
    • 25 October 1985
    ...Accordingly the decisions in Regina v. Durant [1970] 1 W.L.R. 29, Rowlands v. Hamilton [1971] 1 All E.R. 1089, R. v. Newcastle-upon-Tyne Justices, ex parte Hindle [1984] All E.R., 770, and Dawson v. Lunia, The Times Law Report December 13, 1984, to which the court was referred, afford no re......
  • Bruun v Taylor (Police Sergeant)
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • 5 January 2001
    ...Scott & Associates for the Appellant Ms. C. Scott of the DPP's Office for the Respondent R v Newscastle-upo-Tyne JJ ex parte HindleUNK [1984] 1 All ER 770 Benmax v Austin Motor Co LtdUNK [1955] 1 All ER 326 Criminal Appeal Act 1952, s. 11 Drink driving — Appeal against conviction — Appellan......
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Preliminary Sections
    • 29 August 2015
    ...Thomson v Knights [1947] KB 336, [1947] 1 All ER 112, KBD! 551 Thynne v Hindle; R v Newcastle upon Tyne JJ ex p Hindle [1984] 1 All ER 770, ....................................................................................... [1984] RTR 231, DC! 309 .............................................
  • Rationalising the burden of establishing defences at criminal law in Singapore: Reconsidering Jayasena, in the wake of Eu Lim Hoklai
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 21-4, October 2017
    • 1 October 2017
    ...the accused knew of the facts.26 21. Tapper, 2010: 129, citing Lord Devlin in Jayasena, R v Newcastle-upon-Tyne Justices, ex p Hindle [1984] 1 All ER 770, and v Thornton (1967) unreported, a Northern Irish case discussed by Comerton (1968) 19 NILQ 60. 22. Jayasena, n. 4.23. Ibid.24. see Hor......
  • The Assumption that the Proportion of Alcohol or a Drug at the Time of the Offence was not Less than in the Specimen
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Contents
    • 29 August 2015
    ...defence. See also the cases under the heading “Laced Drinks”, page 492. Thynne v Hindle; R v Newcastle upon Tyne JJ ex p Hindle [1984] 1 All ER 770, [1984] RTR 231, 8 August 1983, QBD (DC) It is for the defendant to adduce evidence of drinking after driving. See also Patterson v Charlton, p......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT