R v North, ex parte Oakey
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1927 |
| Year | 1927 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
- Singapore Improvement Ordinance (1927), an application for a writ of prohibition and
- Fung Keong Rubber Manufacturing (M) Sdn Bhd v Lee Eng Kiat and Others
-
Ridge (A.P.) v Baldwin and Others
...opportunity of being heard in his defence, a writ of prohibition directed to the Chancellor was issued (see Rex v. North.Ex parte Oakey [1927] 1 K.B. 491), and Scrutton L.J. (at page 502) said:36 "In my view an order that anyone shall pay the cost of restoring work which has been obliterate......
-
Ridge v Baldwin
... ... Oldham Corporation F1 ; Rex v. Hendon Rural District Council, Ex parte Chorley F2 ; Reg. v. Manchester Legal Aid Committee F3 ; General Medical Council v. Spackman F4 ; ... Minister of Town and Country Planning F25 ; Attorney-General v. Hooper F26 ; Rex v. North, Ex parte Oakey F27 ; Hayman v. Governors of Rugby School F28 ; Colonial Bank of Australasia v ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Mark Hill, the United Kingdom
...been guilty of contempt of the High Court. Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Measure, 1963, s 81(3). 163 See e.g., R. v North, Ex parte Oakey [1927] 1 K.B. 491 (breach of the principles of natural justice). 164 R v Chancellor of St. Edmundsbury and Ipswich Diocese ex parte White [1948] 1 K.B. 195......