R v Northamptonshire County Council ex parte D
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1998 |
Date | 1998 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
[1] Siobahn Nicola Gillespie [2] Citco BVI Ltd Claimants v The Minister of Natural Resources and Labour Defendant
...risk of ex post fact reasoning, R. v Westminster City Council Ex p. Ermakov [1996] 2 All E.R. 302, R. v Northamptonshire CC Ex p. D [1998] Ed. C.R. 14 considered. Moreover, the level of scrutiny required was dependent upon the seriousness of the subject matter of the decision in question. ......
-
Vk and Norfolk County Council and The Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal
...EWHC Admin 538, I sought to summarise the effect of Ermakov, and the decision of Laws J in R (D) v Northamptonshire County Council [1998] ED CR 14, as follows: (i) Where there is a statutory duty to give reasons as part of the notification of the decision, so that (as Laws J put it in North......
-
In The Petitions Of Andrew Somerville, William Cairns, Samuel Ralston, Ricardo Blanco And David Henderson V. The Scottish Ministers
...ex p WithamELRWLRUNK [1998] QB 575; [1998] 2 WLR 849; [1997] 2 All ER 779 R v Northamptonshire County Council, ex p W [1998] ELR 291; [1998] Ed CR 14; [1998] COD 110 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Brind and orsELRWLRUNK [1991] 1 AC 696; [1991] 2 WLR 588; [1991] 1 All E......
-
Magnum Investment Trading Corporation v The Attorney General of the British Virgin Islands
...risk of ex post fact reasoning, R. v Westminster City Council Ex p. Ermakov [1996] 2 ALL E.R. 302, R. v Northamptonshire CC Ex p. D [1998] Ed. C.R. 14 considered. Moreover, the level of scrutiny required was dependent upon the seriousness of the subject matter of the decision in question. ......
Request a trial to view additional results