R v Nottingham Crown Court, ex parte DPP
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1996 |
Year | 1996 |
Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Public Prosecutor v NF
...(folld) R v Kenneth John Ball (1951) 35 Cr App R 164 (folld) R v Nottingham Crown Court, Ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions [1996] 1 Cr App R (S) 283 (folld) R v Peter O's (1993) 14 Cr App R (S) 632 (refd) R v William Christopher Millberry [2003] 2 Cr App R (S) 31 (folld) Sim Yeow Sen......
-
Public Prosecutor v BDO
...to come. In this regard, the court considered the comments in R v Nottingham Crown Court, Ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions [1996] 1 Cr App R (S) 283 at [288] cited by the prosecution where Stuart-Smith LJ stated:- “In my judgment, it is a cardinal principle of sentencing that the co......
-
Public Prosecutor v Amat Affnoi Bin Ahmad
...in a terrified state during the robbery. Stuart-Smith LJ in R v Nottingham Crown Court, Ex Parte Director of Public Prosecutors [1996] 1 CR.APP.R (S) 283 “In my judgement, it is a cardinal principle of sentencing that the Court should take into account when considering the gravity of the of......
-
Public Prosecutor v Leong Soon Kheong
...Effect of the assault on the victim 53 Stuart-Smith LJ in R v Nottingham Crown Court, ex parte Director of the Public Prosecutions (1996) 1 Cr App R (S) 283 at 288 in the context of common assault under s 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 was faced with the question of whether the court w......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Evidential Quality of Victim Personal Statements and Family Impact Statements
...Davies [1998] 1 Cr App R(S) 380; R v Eubank [2002] 1 Cr App R (S) 4; however, the decision in R v Nottingham Crown Court, ex p.DPP [1996] 1 Cr App R (S) 283 seems to be 71 Current Sentencing Practice, Part L2-1C. See R v Clutterham (1982) 4 Cr App R (S) 40; in R v Stubbs (1989) 88 Cr App R ......