R v Offen (No 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 cases
-
R (Lichniak) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...to present no danger to the public. 10 In support of his argument Mr Fitzgerald relied heavily on the decision of the Court of Appeal in R v Offen [2001] 1 WLR 253. That case concerned section 2 of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997, which required a life sentence to be imposed on a person con......
-
R v Drew (Anthony James)
...problem which confronted the Court of Appeal (Lord Woolf CJ, Steel and Richards JJ), after the Human Rights Act 1998 came into force, in R v Offen [2001] 1 WLR 253. The court neatly resolved the problem by holding (page 272, paragraph 79): "It therefore can be assumed the section was not in......
-
R v Richards (Darrell) (No.1)
... ... 12 This passage was considered in Offen [2001] 1 Cr. App. R. 372 ... The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf, said at [79]: "Before leaving Buckland , and turning to the decision in Offen, we should point out that we regard it as a striking feature of the reasoning in Buckland , as in the case of Kelly , that the Court ... ...
-
R v Kelly (Edward) (No.2)
...Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000). All those appeals have arisen largely because of the judgment of this court, Lord Woolf CJ, in the case of Offen [2001] 1 Cr App R 372. The basis for the appeals is that in that case this court adopted a different analysis of the requirements of section 2 from......
Request a trial to view additional results