R v Overseers of Tonbridge

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1883
Date1883
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Chang Kui Moi and Others; Tan Siew Eng and Others
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
  • Baker v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    ...(1969) 15 W.I.R. 359, P.C. Liversidge v. Anderson [1942] A.C. 206; [1941] 3 All E.R. 338, H.L.(E.). Reg. v. Tonbridge Overseers (1884) 13 Q.B.D. 339, C.A. Reg. v. Williams (1970) 16 W.I.R. 63. Reg. v. Wright (1972) 18 W.I.R. 302. Rex v. Cawthron [1913] 3 K.B. 168, C.C.A. Rex v. Fitt [1919] ......
  • R v Bolton and Another, ex parte Beane
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 Abril 1987
    ...that absurdity and inconvenience are to be avoided. As was stated by Brett MR in R v Overseers of the Parish of TonbridgeELR (1884) 13 QBD 339 at 342: ‘… if the inconvenience is not only great, but what I may call an absurd inconvenience, by reading an enactment in its ordinary sense, where......
  • Eaton Baker and Another v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Statutory Interpretation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Income Tax Law. Second Edition Part I
    • 16 Junio 2012
    ...Crystal ), [1894] AC 508 (HL) (interpretation of “possession” at time of salvage and destruction of vessel); R v Overseers of Tonbridge (1884), 13 QBD 339 (CA) (dispute over jurisdiction to levy rates by opposing burial boards; ordinary meaning conf‌licted with other Act). Statutor y Interp......
  • UWAIFO V. A-G. BENDEL STATE & ORS.
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1982 Cases reported in 1982
    • 22 Noviembre 2022
    ...provisions clearly refer to and include retired public officers. CASES REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT: 15 1. Queen v. Overseers of Tonbridge (1884) 13 Q.B.D. 339 at 342. 2. Western Bank Ltd. v. Schindler (1977) Ch. D 1 at 13f to 14a. 3. Luke v. Inland Revenue Commissioners (1963) A.C. 557 at 577. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT