R v Perry
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1909 |
| Year | 1909 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Wesley Mirjah Appellant v The Queen Respondent [Ecsc]
...be proved that the man was dying, and there must be a settled hopeless expectation of death in the declarant". (Per Willes J. inReg v. Peel 2 F & F 21, approved by Lord Alverstone C.J. in delivering the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal in Rex, v. Perry (1909) 2 K.B. 697 at 703). On ......
-
Clive Castello Rawlson Straugh Appellants v The Queen Respondent
...whether it falls within some rigid and artificial category. 19 For example in R v Woodcock 1 Leach 500 which was cited and approved in R v Perry (1909) 2KB 697, 701; 2 Cr.App.R 267 Eyre CB declared that: "The general principle on which this species of evidence is admitted is that they are ......
-
R v Raymond Lawson
...R v Peel (1860) 2 F & F 21; 175 ER 941; R v Cleary (1862) 2 F & F 850; 175 ER 1316; R v Jenkins (supra); R v Bedingfield (1879) 14 Cox 341; R v Perry [1909] 2 KB 697; Nembhard v R (supra). If this condition is held to be clearly satisfied evidence of the statement is in principle admissible......
-
Dean v R
...which is imposed by a positive oath administered in a court of justice.” See paragraph 35–60 of Phipson on Evidence, 16th Edition. 31 In R v. Perry [1909] 2 K.B. 697, Lord Alverstone, CJ set out the principles of law to be applied by a judge when considering whether to admit a statement by ......
Request a trial to view additional results