R v Peter Stanton
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 14 March 1844 |
| Date | 14 March 1844 |
| Court | High Court |
English Reports Citation: 174 E.R. 872
IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH, COMMON PLEAS, AND EXCHEQUER, AND ON THE NORTHERN AND WESTERN CIRCUITS.
Referred to, R v. Camplin, 1845, post, p. 746
[415] (Crown Side) before Mr Justice Coleridge March 14th, 1844. regina v peter stanton (On an indictment for an assault, with intent to commit a rape, the prosecutnx stated, that the defendant, her medical man, being in her bed-room, directed her to lean forward on a bed, that he might apply an injection ; she did so, and the injection having been applied, she found the defendant was proceeding to have a criminal connexion with her, upon which she instantly raised herself up, and ran out of the room. She stated that the defendant had penetrated her peison " a little " :-Held, that if it had appeared that the defendant had intended to have had a criminal connexion with the prosecutnx by force, the complete offence of rape would, upon this evidence, have been proved, but that the thus getting...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
- R v Morgan
-
R v Dee
...JJ. THE QUEEN and DEE R. v. JacksonENR Russ. & Ry. 487. R. v. SaundersENR 8 C. & P. 265. R. v. Williams Ibid. 286. R. v. StauntonENR 1 Car, & K. 415. R. v. CamplinENR 1 Den. C. C. 89. R. v. Ryan 2 Cox, C. C. 115. R. v. CaseENR 1 Den. C. C. 580. R. v. ClarkeENR Dears. C. C. 397; 24 L. J. Mag......
-
R. v. Leary
...an intention on his (accused's) part to commit the act by force against her will". And see Regina v. Stanton (1844), 1 Car & K. 415, 174 E.R. 872. In Rex v. Lloyd (1836), 7 C. & P. 318, 173 E.R. 141, the jury were told by Patteson J. "In order to find the prisoner guilty of an assau......
-
R. v. MacNeil, (1976) 16 N.S.R.(2d) 366 (CA)
...an intent on his (accused's) part to commit the act by force against her will'. And see R. v. Stanton (1844), 1 Car. & K. 415, 174 E.R. 872. In R. v. Lloyd (1836), 7 C. & P. 318 at p. 319, 173 E.R. 141, the jury were told by Patteson J., 'In order to find the prisoner guilty of an a......