R v Pople
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1950 |
| Year | 1950 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
R v Ming
...359; [1968] 2 All E.R. 1009; (1968), 52 Cr. App. R. 528; [1968] Crim. L.R. 403, dicta of Lord Parker, C.J. applied. (2) R. v. Pople, [1951] 1 K.B. 53; [1950] 2 All E.R. 679; (1950), 34 Cr. App. R. 168, dicta of Humphreys J. applied. Legislation construed: Criminal Procedure Code (2010 Revis......
-
R v Alibhai
...is not confined to cases in which there are formal defects in the wording of a count. It was said by the Court of Appeal in R v Pople [1951] 1 KB 53, 54 (reported sub nom. R v Smith (1950) 34 Cr. App. R. 168, 176) that "… any alteration [of an indictment] in matters of description, and pro......
-
DPP v Walsh
...the counts in the indictment should correspond as closely as was reasonably possible with the real case for the prosecution. R. v. Pople [1951] 1 K.B. 53, R. v. Johal[1973] Q.B. 475, R. v. Chuah [1991] Crim. L.R. 463, R. v. McVitie [1960] 2 Q.B. 483, andR. v. Dossi (1918) 13 Cr. App. R. 158......
-
Warren Cassell First Claimant Cassell & Lewis Second Claimant v The Magistrate First Defendent Attorney General Second Defendant [ECSC]
...and the evidence foreshadowed in the committal statements or called at trial. This was confirmed by the Court of Criminal Appeal inPople [1951] 1KB 53 at p. 54: "The argument for the appellants to involve the proposition that an indictment in order to be defective, must be one which in law ......
Request a trial to view additional results