R v Power

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1919
Year1919
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • PP; Tengku Abdul Aziz
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 1951
  • R v Abbott
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • Invalid date
    ... ... In those circumstances the Court of Criminal Appeal was not obliged to take into account the adverse evidence given against him when the case was wrongly left to the jury ... Rex v. Cohen and Bateman (1909) 2 Cr.App.R. 197 applied ... Rex v. Power" [1919] 1 K.B. 572; 35 T.L.R. 283 explained ... APPEAL against conviction ... The appellant, Charles Clement Abbott, and a woman named Ruth Wales, were tried before Glyn-Jones J. at Manchester Assizes upon an indictment which charged them with forgery of a valuable security, namely, a receipt for \xC2" ... ...
  • R v Cockley
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 16 Marzo 1984
    ...had been wrong in law not to withdraw the case against Cockley from the jury. He very properly drew to our attention the case of Power (1919)1 K.B. 572, where it was said that if a judge wrongly overruled a submission of no case, and then one defendant gave evidence against the other, the a......
  • Lim Kheng Kooi and Another v R
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 1957
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • ASABA & ORS V. THE QUEEN
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1961 Cases reported in 1961
    • 11 Noviembre 2022
    ...5 Crim. App. R. 22; 74 J.P. 352. 6. R. v. Joiner 4 Crim. App. R. 64; 26 T.L.R. 265; 74 J.P. 200. 7. R. v. Power 14 Crim. App. R. 17; (1919) 1 K.B. 572; 88 L.J.K.B. 593; 120 L.T. 577; 83 J.P. 124; 35 T.L.R. 283; 26 Cox C.C.399. 50 8. R. v. Abbott (1955) 2 Q.B. 497; (1955) 2 All E.R. 899; 199......