R v Power
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1919 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
R v Abbott
......In those circumstances the Court of Criminal Appeal was not obliged to take into account the adverse evidence given against him when the case was wrongly left to the jury. Rex v. Cohen and Bateman (1909) 2 Cr.App.R. 197 applied. Rex v. Power [1919] 1 K.B. 572; 35 T.L.R. 283 explained. APPEAL against conviction. The appellant, Charles Clement Abbott, and a woman named Ruth Wales, were tried before Glyn-Jones J. at Manchester Assizes upon an indictment which charged them with forgery of a valuable security, namely, a receipt for £2,415, ......
-
R v Cockley
...trial judge had been wrong in law not to withdraw the case against Cockley from the jury. He very properly drew to our attention the case of Power (1919)1 K.B. 572, where it was said that if a judge wrongly overruled a submission of no case, and then one defendant gave evidence against the ......
- PP; Tengku Abdul Aziz
- Lim Kheng Kooi and Another v R
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
ASABA & ORS V. THE QUEEN
...5 Crim. App. R. 22; 74 J.P. 352. 6. R. v. Joiner 4 Crim. App. R. 64; 26 T.L.R. 265; 74 J.P. 200. 7. R. v. Power 14 Crim. App. R. 17; (1919) 1 K.B. 572; 88 L.J.K.B. 593; 120 L.T. 577; 83 J.P. 124; 35 T.L.R. 283; 26 Cox C.C.399. 50 8. R. v. Abbott (1955) 2 Q.B. 497; (1955) 2 All E.R. 899; 199......