R v Priestley
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1966 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
66 cases
-
R v Richards
... ... Hartz, recently pronounced in their Lordships' House It is for consideration whether the decision of this Court in Priestley - a fairly recent decision - is wholly consonant with those decisions ... 3 Hero a police officer said to the Appellant at a time when already a number of questions had boon asked and he had boon pressed somewhat about his movements during the material afternoon, and had made lying ... ...
- Dato' Mokhtar Hashim and Another v Public Prosecutor
- Juraimi Husin v PP
-
Chai Chien Wei Kelvin v Public Prosecutor
...inadmissible, and whether the accused has been subjected to oppression is a question of fact: Seow Choon Meng v PP . In R v Priestley [1967] 51 Cr App R 1, Sachs LJ, as he then was, said: [T]his word [oppression] imports something which tends to sap, and has sapped, that free will which mus......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 2010
...voluntariness in the paragraphs preceding, were not challenged in the Court of Appeal: see Muhammad bin Kadar v PP[2011] 3 SLR 1205. 73(1967) 51 Cr App R 1. 74[1998] 3 SLR(R) 619 at [56]. 75Chai Chien Wei Kelvin v PP[1998] 3 SLR(R) 619 at [57]. 76 See, for example, the cases of Chai Chien W......
-
Resolving the Application of the Christie Discretion in the Uniform Evidence Legislation
...124 Forbes, above n 111, citing R v McKay [1965] Qd R 240, 246; R v Priestly (1967) 51 Cr App R 1, 2 (Sachs LJ). 125 R v Carusi (1997) 92 A Crim R 52, 65–6 (Hunt CJ); R v XY [2013] NSWCCA 121 [66] (Basten JA); R v Shamouil [2006] NSWCCA 112 [63] (Spigelman CJ). 126 [2013] NSWCCA 121 [224]–[......